A Combinatorial Search Perspective on Diverse Solution Generation

Authors: Satya Gautam Vadlamudi, Subbarao Kambhampati

AAAI 2016 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Experimental results show the efficacy of the proposed framework compared to an existing greedy approach.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Satya Gautam Vadlamudi and Subbarao Kambhampati School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering Arizona State University {gautam , rao}@asu.edu
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 presents a simple strategy called ACER; Algorithm 2 presents the proposed method MCER; Algorithm 3 presents the pseudo-code of Expand Most Promising routine.
Open Source Code No The paper mentions implementing methods on top of an existing planning environment but does not state that the code for the described methodology is open source or provide a link.
Open Datasets No The paper mentions using standard planning domains ('Blocks', 'Rovers', 'Zeno-Travel') but does not provide specific access information (URL, DOI, citation with authors/year) for these datasets, only for the Fast Downward planning environment tool.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not specify exact percentages, sample counts, or reference predefined splits for training, validation, or test sets.
Hardware Specification Yes All the experiments have been performed on a machine with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v2 at 3.70GHz and 64GB RAM.
Software Dependencies No We have implemented all our methods on top of the Fast Downward planning environment (Helmert 2006). The paper names the software but does not provide a specific version number.
Experiment Setup Yes Table 2 presents the comparison of DFAM and A*AM methods (with plan-combinations seed set size equal to 30 in each execution). We have used the LMcut heuristic which is admissible, to guide the search.