Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].
Reproducibility Score Trend
Edition reproducibility score by venue over time.
Documentation Score Trend
Edition documentation score by venue over time.
Latest Editions
Browse reproducibility metrics across the latest editions of each venue.
|
Reproducibility Score based on Gundersen et al. (2025)
|
Global mean is the average score over the seven reproducibility variables for empirical research papers.
|
Percentage of papers that are empirical research vs theoretical research
|
Percentage of empirical research papers with at least one author from Industry
|
Website | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAAI | 2025 | 2903 | 0.58 | 3.83 | 95.8% | 27.62% | |
| DMLR | 2025 | 13 | 0.76 | 4.55 | 84.62% | 18.18% | |
| ICLR | 2025 | 3700 | 0.66 | 4.54 | 97.97% | 42.65% | |
| ICML | 2025 | 3330 | 0.61 | 4.42 | 94.95% | 36.69% | |
| IJCAI | 2025 | 1015 | 0.56 | 3.82 | 92.32% | 17.18% | |
| JAIR | 2025 | 132 | 0.51 | 3.89 | 72.73% | 14.58% | |
| JMLR | 2025 | 269 | 0.46 | 3.79 | 86.99% | 17.52% | |
| NeurIPS | 2024 | 4035 | 0.69 | 4.65 | 93.63% | 39.25% | |
| TMLR | 2025 | 1418 | 0.62 | 4.51 | 94.71% | 33.8% |