A Model for Aggregating Contributions of Synergistic Crowdsourcing Workflows

Authors: Yili Fang, Hailong Sun, Richong Zhang, Jinpeng Huai, Yongyi Mao

AAAI 2014 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Empirical studies confirms the superiority of our proposed model. Experiment Setup To evaluate the effectiveness and time needed of our proposed model, we give simulation. Figure 3 illustrates that the accuracy of the assembly model is higher than the single choice model from 0th iteration to 90th.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing,China 2School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any clearly labeled pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any concrete access information (e.g., repository links, explicit statements of code release) for the source code of the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper uses a simulated environment for its experiments rather than a publicly available dataset. It states: "A CST with M subtasks is simulated with a pool of M objects, each of which represents a subtask." and "Each worker generates a set of objects to simulate the output of CST".
Dataset Splits No The paper describes a simulation setup and compares models but does not provide specific details on dataset splits (e.g., percentages or counts for training, validation, or testing sets).
Hardware Specification No The paper does not specify any hardware details (e.g., CPU, GPU models, memory) used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using the "ZMDP package" but does not provide a specific version number for it or any other software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes Experiment Setup To evaluate the effectiveness and time needed of our proposed model, we give simulation. A CST with M subtasks is simulated with a pool of M objects, each of which represents a subtask. Each object contains ID and difficulty. Each worker generates a set of objects to simulate the output of CST, which contains the ID of subtask processed by workers and the skill excellence of workers, where the ID follows a Gaussian distribution N(µ, σi2), and the skill excellence represents whether the output of the subtask is correct. we make Rs = Z M as the rewarding function based on the accuracy. The progress of the CST consisting of 300 subtasks through the assembly model and the single choice model is simulated.