Active Recurrence of Lighting Condition for Fine-Grained Change Detection

Authors: Qian Zhang, Wei Feng, Liang Wan, Fei-Peng Tian, Ping Tan

IJCAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Extensive quantitative experiments and challenging real-world tasks on fine-grained change monitoring of cultural heritages verify the effectiveness of our approach. We also validate its generality to non-Lambertian scenes.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Qian Zhang1,2, Wei Feng1,2 , Liang Wan2,3, Fei-Peng Tian1,2, Ping Tan4 1 School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, China 2Key Research Center for Surface Monitoring and Analysis of Cultural Relics, SACH, China 3 School of Computer Software, Tianjin University, China 4 School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Canada
Pseudocode No The paper includes a working flow diagram (Figure 2) but no formal pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No No explicit statement or link regarding open-source code for the described methodology.
Open Datasets No We build 7 scenes (S1 7) to evaluate our ALR method and baselines. S1 3 are near-Lambertian scenes. S4 7 are non Lambertian scenes, including many specular (S4, S7), transparent (S5) and cast shadow (S6) regions respectively. For each scene, we collect 20 multi-illumination images by a Canon 5D Mark III camera.
Dataset Splits No In practice, we only need K 12 side lighting images for initialization. This process is terminated by an ALR goodness g that measures the recurrence accuracy by the overlap ratio of Cref and Ct, If g is good enough, e.g., g > 0.99, the ALR process stops.
Hardware Specification No We use a small LED bulb as the near point light source to carry out the experiments. We collect 20 multi-illumination images by a Canon 5D Mark III camera.
Software Dependencies No To compare with our ALR method, we use PTM [Tom et al., 2001], HSH [Elhabian et al., 2011], LDR [Favaro and Papadhimitri, 2012] as our baselines. Fine-grained changes are detected by FGCD algorithm [Feng et al., 2015] for both ALR and PTM results.
Experiment Setup Yes In our experiments, we empirically set rλ 0 = θλ 0 = φλ 0 = 3mm in our robotic platform. µ is the speed-up rate of navigation magnitude and is empirically set as 1.2 in our experiments.