Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].
Allocation Problems in Ride-Sharing Platforms: Online Matching With Offline Reusable Resources
Authors: John Dickerson, Karthik Sankararaman, Aravind Srinivasan, Pan Xu
AAAI 2018 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | Through a data-driven analysis on a massive openly-available dataset, we show our model is robust enough to capture the application of taxi dispatching services and ridesharing systems. We also present heuristics that perform well in practice. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | John P. Dickerson University of Maryland, College Park, USA EMAIL, Karthik A. Sankararaman University of Maryland, College Park, USA EMAIL, Aravind Srinivasan University of Maryland, College Park, USA EMAIL, University of Maryland, College Park, USA EMAIL |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1: Simulation-based adaptive algorithm (ADAP(γ)) |
| Open Source Code | No | The paper discusses an 'openly-available dataset' but does not provide any statement or link for the source code of their proposed methodology or algorithms. |
| Open Datasets | Yes | To validate the approaches presented in this paper, we use the New York City yellow cabs dataset,5 which contains the trip records for trips in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens for the year 2013. 5http://www.andresmh.com/nyctaxitrips/ |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper mentions splitting data for 'training purposes' and 'testing purposes' but does not specify a separate 'validation' split for model tuning. |
| Hardware Specification | No | The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware used for running the experiments (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory). |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper does not provide specific software dependencies with version numbers used for the experiments. |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | We set we = max(L1 αL2, 0), where α is a parameter capturing the subtle balance between the positive contribution from the trip distance and negative contribution from the docking distance to the final profit. We set α = 0.5 for the experiments. We consider each single day as the time horizon and set the total number of rounds T = 24 * 60 / 5 = 288 by discretizing the 24-hour period into a time-step of 5 minutes. In our algorithm, we optimized the value of ϵ and set it to ϵ = 0.1. |