An Experimental View on Committees Providing Justified Representation

Authors: Robert Bredereck, Piotr Faliszewski, Andrzej Kaczmarczyk, Rolf Niedermeier

IJCAI 2019 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We provide an experimental study of committees that achieve (proportional/extended) justified representation (JR/PJR/EJR). In particular, we ask how many such committees exist and how varied they are in terms of voter satisfaction and coverage.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany 2AGH University, Krak ow, Poland
Pseudocode No The paper describes algorithms (like ILPs) but does not provide structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide explicit statements or links to open-source code for the described methodology.
Open Datasets Yes We focus on elections generated according to (a variant of) the impartial culture model and two Euclidean models [Enelow and Hinich, 1984; Enelow and Hinich, 1990]... We have tried different election types (not reported in the paper): the Polya-Eggenberger urn model [Berg, 1985], Euclidean elections with different distributions of the candidate and voter points, and various real-life elections from Pref Lib [Mattei and Walsh, 2013].
Dataset Splits No The paper describes generating synthetic election data and using real-life elections but does not specify any training, validation, or test dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not specify the hardware used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using integer linear programs (ILPs) and Gurobi, but does not provide specific software names with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes Unless specified otherwise, our elections have m = 100 candidates, n = 100 voters, and committees of size k = 10. We considered the following parameter values: 1. For a probability value p, under the p-Impartial Culture model (p-IC) each voter i approves each candidate cj independently, with probability p. 2. In the Euclidean model... In the r-Uniform Interval (r-UI) and r-Uniform Square (r-US) models, the candidate and voter points are chosen uniformly at random from the interval [0, 1] or from the square [0, 1] [0, 1], respectively, and each voter approves candidates within radius r. For each model of random elections and each parameter value, we generated 500 elections with 100 candidates and 100 voters each.