An Operational Semantics for a Fragment of PRS

Authors: Lavindra de Silva, Felipe Meneguzzi, Brian Logan

IJCAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical This paper takes a first step towards closing this gap, by giving a formal semantics for a significant fragment of PRS. We prove key properties of the semantics relating to PRS-specific programming constructs, and show that even the fragment of PRS we consider is strictly more expressive than the plan constructs found in typical BDI languages.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Lavindra de Silva1, Felipe Meneguzzi2 and Brian Logan3 1 Institute for Advanced Manufacturing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 2 Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil 3 School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Pseudocode Yes Fig. 2 shows the derivation rules for actions, belief updates, and goal commitment.
Open Source Code No The paper is theoretical, providing formal semantics and proofs, and does not mention the release of source code for an implementation.
Open Datasets No This is a theoretical paper focused on formal semantics and proofs; it does not use or refer to any datasets for training.
Dataset Splits No This is a theoretical paper focused on formal semantics and proofs; it does not use datasets or specify any dataset splits for validation.
Hardware Specification No As a theoretical paper, it does not involve computational experiments that would require hardware specifications.
Software Dependencies No The paper describes a formal semantic framework and proofs, not an implementation, and therefore does not specify any software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No This is a theoretical paper, and no experiments were conducted; therefore, no experimental setup details, hyperparameters, or training configurations are provided.