Approximate Inference via Weighted Rademacher Complexity

Authors: Jonathan Kuck, Ashish Sabharwal, Stefano Ermon

AAAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Our experiments demonstrate that we can produce tighter bounds than competing methods in both the weighted and unweighted settings.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Jonathan Kuck Computer Science Department Stanford University jkuck@cs.stanford.edu Ashish Sabharwal Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence Seattle, WA ashishs@allenai.org Stefano Ermon Computer Science Department Stanford University ermon@cs.stanford.edu
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Rademacher Estimate of log Z(w)
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide explicit links or statements regarding the open-source code for the methodology it describes.
Open Datasets Yes The models used in our experiments can be downloaded from http://reasoning.cs.ucla.edu/c2d/results.html
Dataset Splits No The paper does not explicitly provide training/test/validation dataset splits, percentages, or sample counts, nor does it refer to predefined splits with citations for reproducibility.
Hardware Specification No The paper mentions using specific software implementations (python maxflow module, Max HS solver) but does not provide any specific hardware details such as GPU/CPU models or memory used for the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions software like 'python maxflow module' and 'Max HS' but does not specify their version numbers or other software dependencies with versioning for reproducibility.
Experiment Setup Yes Figure 2: Bounds for a 7x7 spin glass model with k = 5 (for both methods), that hold with probability .95.