Beauty-in-averageness and its contextual modulations: A Bayesian statistical account

Authors: Chaitanya Ryali, Angela J. Yu

NeurIPS 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We use simulations to show that our model provides a parsimonious, statistically grounded, and quantitative account of both Bi A and Ui A. We validate our model using experimental data from a gender categorization task.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Chaitanya K. Ryali Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093 rckrishn@eng.ucsd.edu Angela J. Yu Department of Cognitive Science University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093 ajyu@ucsd.edu
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not include any explicit statements about making its source code available or provide a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets Yes We train our version of AAM using a publicly available dataset of 597 face images [44], with neutral facial expression taken in the laboratory. [44] Ma, D. S., Correll, J. & Wittenbrink, B. The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods 47, 1122 1135 (2015).
Dataset Splits No The paper describes generating stimuli and using a publicly available dataset, but it does not specify explicit training, validation, and testing splits (e.g., percentages or sample counts) for its model or the AAM training data.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware (e.g., CPU, GPU models, memory) used to run the experiments or simulations.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using 'the free software Face++' but does not provide a specific version number. No other software dependencies are listed with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes Simulation parameters: d = 60, drace = 1, s = 2, σ0 = 1, σr = 0.5 and µ = 1, |K| = 50, σsal = 0.2, P|K| k=1 pk = 0.05, all simulations in 2-d subspace, corresponding to a random subspace or a distinctive feature subspace. We use the top 60 principal components (highest eigenvalues) (d = 60 for our face space).