Best-Case and Worst-Case Behavior of Greedy Best-First Search

Authors: Manuel Heusner, Thomas Keller, Malte Helmert

IJCAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We perform computational experiments on benchmark tasks from the International Planning Competitions that compare the best and worst cases of greedy best-first search to FIFO, LIFO and random tie-breaking. The experiments demonstrate the importance of tie-breaking in greedy best-first search.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Manuel Heusner, Thomas Keller and Malte Helmert University of Basel, Switzerland {manuel.heusner,tho.keller,malte.helmert}@unibas.ch
Pseudocode No The paper describes algorithms verbally and illustrates concepts with figures, but it does not contain any formal pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper states 'We implemented all presented algorithms in the Fast Downward planning system [Helmert, 2006]', but it does not provide a link or explicit statement that their specific implementation for this paper is open-source or publicly available.
Open Datasets Yes We implemented all presented algorithms in the Fast Downward planning system [Helmert, 2006] and performed experiments on the benchmark sets of the 1998 2014 International Planning Competitions (IPC) with the h FF heuristic [Hoffmann and Nebel, 2001] and unit cost.
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions using 'benchmark sets of the 1998 2014 International Planning Competitions', but it does not specify any training, validation, or test dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific hardware details such as CPU/GPU models, memory, or cloud computing instance types used for the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions 'Fast Downward planning system [Helmert, 2006]' and 'h FF heuristic [Hoffmann and Nebel, 2001]', but it does not provide specific version numbers for these software dependencies as used in their experiments.
Experiment Setup Yes We restricted the benchmark sets to tasks where GBFS search with h FF and FIFO tie-breaking found a plan within 30 minutes and 3.5 GB memory, which has been possible for 2519 instances. For each instance, we computed the reduced state space with step 1 4 of surface graph computation, and determined the relevant properties of the state space topology, i.e., if it is overlap-free (with respect to benches and craters) or not overlap-free but undirected. This was possible for 764 instances from 78 domains within a time limit of 30 minutes and a memory limit of 3.5 GB.