Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Pooling

Authors: Naveen Raman, Sanket Shah, John Dickerson

IJCAI 2021 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental To evaluate our methods, we utilize the New York City taxi data set [New York City, 2016]... We run experiments comparing the different objective functions on both profitability and fairness metrics.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Naveen Raman1 , Sanket Shah2 , John P. Dickerson1 1University of Maryland 2Harvard University nraman1@umd.edu, sanketshah@g.harvard.edu, john@cs.umd.edu
Pseudocode No The paper describes algorithmic steps but does not include structured pseudocode or an algorithm block.
Open Source Code Yes 1Our code and data is publicly available at https://github.com/naveenr414/ijcai-rideshare
Open Datasets Yes To evaluate our methods, we utilize the New York City taxi data set [New York City, 2016]
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions training and testing but does not explicitly provide specific train/validation/test dataset splits (e.g., percentages or sample counts).
Hardware Specification No The paper does not explicitly describe the specific hardware (e.g., CPU, GPU models, memory) used for running its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper indicates the use of deep learning and a neural network but does not provide specific software names with version numbers for reproducibility (e.g., Python 3.x, TensorFlow 2.x, PyTorch 1.x).
Experiment Setup No The paper has a section titled 'Experiment Setup' (4.4), but it defers the concrete hyperparameter values and detailed value function training specifics to 'Appendix B', which is not part of the main text provided.