Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].
Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition Numbers
Authors: Yuxing Liu, Lesi Chen, Luo Luo
ICML 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | We further perform numerical experiments to validate the advantage of our method. In this section, we provide the numerical experiments to compare the performance of CESAR with baseline methods Mudag (Ye et al., 2023), Acc-VR-EXTRA and Acc-VR-DIGING (Li et al., 2022a). We conduct our experiments on datasets a9a and w6a (Chang & Lin, 2011). |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | 1School of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 3 Shanghai Key Laboratory for Contemporary Applied Mathematics, Shanghai, China. Correspondence to: Luo Luo <EMAIL>. |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 2 CESAR |
| Open Source Code | No | The paper does not provide any specific link or statement indicating that the source code for CESAR is publicly available. |
| Open Datasets | Yes | We conduct our experiments on datasets a9a and w6a (Chang & Lin, 2011). |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper mentions using datasets for experiments but does not explicitly detail the train/validation/test splits, percentages, or absolute counts for reproducibility. |
| Hardware Specification | No | The paper does not specify the hardware used to run the experiments (e.g., GPU models, CPU types, or cloud instances). |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper does not provide specific version numbers for any software dependencies used in the experiments. |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | We set the mixing matrix W to be associated with a random graph that each edge is connected with probability 1/30, which leads to 1 λ2(W) 0.0382. The condition numbers in our problem are listed in Table 3. |