Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Differentially private exact recovery for stochastic block models

Authors: Dung Nguyen, Anil Kumar Vullikanti

ICML 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical Our focus here is on the theoretical foundations of the problem.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Department of Computer Science and Biocomplexity Institute and Initiative, University of Virginia, Virginia, USA.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Mf Stbl(G): Stability Mechanism
Open Source Code No We maintain a full, updated version of this work at (Nguyen & Vullikanti, 2024). (URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02644, which points to the paper itself, not source code.)
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and focuses on derivations and conditions; it does not use or reference specific datasets for training or empirical evaluation.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and focuses on derivations and conditions; it does not use or reference specific datasets for validation or empirical evaluation, nor does it discuss dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and focuses on mathematical derivations and algorithm design; it does not describe computational experiments that would require specific hardware specifications.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and focuses on mathematical derivations and algorithm design; it does not list specific software dependencies with version numbers for experimental reproducibility.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and focuses on mathematical derivations and algorithm design; it does not describe an empirical experimental setup with hyperparameters or training configurations.