Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in Coakley et alK. L. Coakley, T. Snelleman, H. Hoos, and O. E. Gundersen, "The embrace of open science: An analysis of a decade of AI research and 56 800 conference papers," Under Review, 2026..

Embodied Active Defense: Leveraging Recurrent Feedback to Counter Adversarial Patches

Authors: Lingxuan Wu, Xiao Yang, Yinpeng Dong, Liuwei XIE, Hang Su, Jun Zhu

ICLR 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Extensive experiments demonstrate that EAD substantially enhances robustness against a variety of patches within just a few steps through its action policy in safety-critical tasks (e.g., face recognition and object detection), without compromising standard accuracy.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Lingxuan Wu1, Xiao Yang1 , Yinpeng Dong1,2, Liuwei Xie1, Hang Su1, Jun Zhu1,2 1 Dept. of Comp. Sci. and Tech., Institute for AI, Tsinghua-Bosch Joint ML Center, THBI Lab, BNRist Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China 2 Real AI
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Learning Embodied Active Defense
Open Source Code No The paper mentions using several open-source implementations for baselines and pre-trained models (e.g., EG3D, LGS, SAC, DOA, Arc Face, YOLOv5) but does not provide a specific link or statement for the open-source release of the Embodied Active Defense (EAD) methodology described in this paper. It mentions a dataset release is 'forthcoming'.
Open Datasets Yes We conduct our experiments on Celeb A-3D, which we utilize GAN inversion (Zhu et al., 2016) with EG3D (Chan et al., 2022) to reconstruct 2D face image from Celeb A into a 3D form. The Celeb A-3D dataset inherits annotations from the original Celeb A dataset, which is accessible at https://mmlab.ie.cuhk.edu.cn/projects/CelebA.html. The release of this dataset for public access is forthcoming.
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions using a 'training set' and 'test pairs'/'test scenes' for evaluation, but does not explicitly provide detailed train/validation/test dataset splits, such as specific percentages, sample counts for each split, or a dedicated validation set description for reproducibility.
Hardware Specification Yes The performance assessment is conducted on a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and an AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core Processor, using a training batch size of 64. ... The offline training utilized 2 NVIDIA Tesla A100 GPUs for approximately 4 hours (210 minutes). ... the online training phase required 8 NVIDIA Tesla A100 GPUs and extended to about 14 hours (867 minutes).
Software Dependencies Yes We use the official implementation and pre-trained model checkpoints for both YOLOv5n and YOLOv5x at https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5. ultralytics/yolov5: v5. 0-yolov5-p6 1280 models, aws, supervise. ly and youtube integrations. Zenodo, 2021.
Experiment Setup Yes To expedite EAD s learning of efficient policies requiring minimal perceptual steps, we configure the max horizon length τ = 4. ... Table 5: Hyper-parameters of EAD for face recognition ... Table 11: Hyper-Parameters of EAD for object detection