Flexible Representative Democracy: An Introduction with Binary Issues

Authors: Ben Abramowitz, Nicholas Mattei

IJCAI 2019 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We find through theoretical and empirical analysis that FRD can yield significant improvements over RD for emulating DD with full participation.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA 2Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide concrete access to source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper generates data for its simulations rather than using a pre-existing publicly available dataset with concrete access information. For instance, it states: 'In all our simulations, for all issues si we let vi j = 1 and ci l = 1 with probability 1 2 for all voters and candidates. This means that all candidates and voters come from the same populations, i.e., that they are both drawn from the same distribution'.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not specify exact training, validation, and test splits; it describes the process of generating synthetic data for simulations and running iterations.
Hardware Specification Yes We implemented these rules in Gurobi 8.1 and used a server with 16 cores and 32GB of memory
Software Dependencies Yes We implemented these rules in Gurobi 8.1
Experiment Setup Yes For all simulations we perform 50 iterations at each datapoint and plot the mean (σ2 0.002). For our simulated delegations we create instances with |V| = 301, |C| = 60, |S| = 150, and k = 21. We vary α {0, 1.0} in increments of 0.01 and for each setting of α we run 50 iterations.