How to Form Winning Coalitions in Mixed Human-Computer Settings

Authors: Yair Zick, Kobi Gal, Yoram Bachrach, Moshe Mash

IJCAI 2017 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Using this platform, we collected hundreds of instances of users negotiation dynamics, the coalitions they formed, and the way revenue was shared. We designed a negotiating software agent and tested its performance when interacting with other people playing this game. We compare several predictive models using the above features, varying the type of power index used (Banzhaf, Shapley-Shubik, Banzhaf, Deegan-Packel, Extended Deegan-Packel). For each power index configuration, we implement several supervised machine learning models: logistic regression, a multilayer neural network (3 hidden layers, 3 decision nodes in each layer), and a Naive Bayes model. We report the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC)...
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Moshe Mash Ben-Gurion University mashm@post.bgu.ac.il Yoram Bachrach Digital Genius yorambac@gmail.com Ya akov (Kobi) Gal Ben-Gurion University kobig@bgu.ac.il Yair Zick National University of Singapore zick@comp.nus.edu.sg
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or clearly labeled algorithm blocks were found in the paper.
Open Source Code Yes In the spirit of public repositories in computational social choice [Mattei and Walsh, 2013; Tal et al., 2015], we are making our platform open source, and have created a public library which will include all of the collected data, and made freely available to the research community at https://tinyurl.com/mrna7w6.
Open Datasets Yes Using this platform, we collected hundreds of instances of users negotiation dynamics, the coalitions they formed, and the way revenue was shared. we are making our platform open source, and have created a public library which will include all of the collected data, and made freely available to the research community at https://tinyurl.com/mrna7w6.
Dataset Splits Yes Table 1 describes the AUC score the logistic regression for the different indices using ten-fold cross validation.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware used for running experiments or training models.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions machine learning models used but does not provide specific software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes Finding an approximately optimal x is done by iterating over all possible payoff divisions in 5 unit intervals. All subjects played a 5-agent configuration of the cooperative negotiation game, in which agent weights varied between 1 and 9, the threshold t was set to 10, and the coalition value r was set to 100. The maximal number of rounds was set to 3 for all games.