Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Information Gathering in Networks via Active Exploration

Authors: Adish Singla, Eric Horvitz, Pushmeet Kohli, Ryen White, Andreas Krause

IJCAI 2015 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We evaluate our methodology on various simulated problem instances as well as on data collected from social question answering system deployed within a large enterprise.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Adish Singla ETH Zurich EMAIL Eric Horvitz Microsoft Research EMAIL Pushmeet Kohli Microsoft Research EMAIL Ryen White Microsoft Research EMAIL Andreas Krause ETH Zurich EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Algorithm NETEXP
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide a direct link to open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper mentions generating synthetic datasets ('Erd os-R enyi random graph', 'Preferential attachment graph') and using a 'real-world social Q&A system' dataset, but it does not provide concrete access information (link, DOI, repository, formal citation with authors/year) for any publicly available or open dataset.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not provide specific dataset split information (exact percentages, sample counts, or citations to predefined splits) for training, validation, or testing data needed to reproduce the partitioning.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific hardware details (e.g., CPU/GPU models, memory) used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not specify any software dependencies with version numbers (e.g., Python 3.x, PyTorch 1.x).
Experiment Setup Yes We considered a realistic setting of ldeg = 1 and lval = 1 visibility. For running different algorithms, we considered value quota Q = 1, with tolerance of β = 0.05. We used ϵ = 0.5 for NETEXP across all of the datasets without any further tuning.