Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Interpretable Minority Synthesis for Imbalanced Classification

Authors: Yi He, Fudong Lin, Xu Yuan, Nian-Feng Tzeng

IJCAI 2021 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Empirical studies substantiate that our approach can empower simple classifiers to achieve superior imbalanced classification performance over the state-of-the-art competitors and is robust across various imbalance settings.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Yi He , Fudong Lin , Xu Yuan and Nian-Feng Tzeng University of Louisiana at Lafayette EMAIL
Pseudocode No The paper describes its approach in section 3, but it does not include a clearly labeled 'Pseudocode' or 'Algorithm' block.
Open Source Code Yes Code is released in github.com/fudonglin/IMSIC.
Open Datasets Yes We benchmark our experiments on two widely used image sets, namely, MNIST [Le Cun et al., 2010] and Fashion-MNIST [Xiao et al., 2017].
Dataset Splits Yes We perform a 10-fold crossvalidation to eliminate the randomization bias and record the averaged results and the corresponding statistics.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not explicitly describe the hardware used for experiments, such as specific GPU or CPU models.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions feeding datasets 'to three CNNs with an identical architecture', but it does not specify any software names with version numbers, such as specific deep learning frameworks or libraries.
Experiment Setup No The paper does not provide specific details about the experimental setup, such as hyperparameter values (e.g., learning rate, batch size) or optimizer settings.