Layer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward Algorithm

Authors: Guy Lorberbom, Itai Gat, Yossi Adi, Alexander Schwing, Tamir Hazan

AAAI 2024 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We empirically demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed version when considering both information flow and objective metrics.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration 1Technion 2 FAIR Team, Meta AI Research 3 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 4University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Forward-Forward; Algorithm 2: Collaborative Forward-Forward
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any explicit statement about making the source code available or provide a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets Yes We compare those methods using MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10.
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions training on datasets like MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10, and shows performance over epochs (Figures 2 and 4), but it does not specify explicit training, validation, or test dataset split percentages, counts, or a detailed methodology for splitting.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware (e.g., GPU model, CPU type, memory) used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using SGD for optimization but does not list any specific software libraries or their version numbers (e.g., Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow versions) that would be needed for reproducibility.
Experiment Setup No The paper mentions hyperparameters like θ and training concepts like SGD and epochs. It also states "We detail the experimental setup in the appendix.", but since the appendix text is not provided, the main body of the paper does not contain concrete numerical values for hyperparameters (e.g., learning rate, batch size) or detailed system-level training configurations needed for reproducibility.