Local Minima, Heavy Tails, and Search Effort for GBFS

Authors: Eldan Cohen, J. Christopher Beck

IJCAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental In this section we present an empirical analysis of the local minima phenomenon in GBFS. We present results for the FF heuristic [Hoffmann and Nebel, 2001] with deferred ( lazy ) heuristic evaluation [Richter and Helmert, 2009], however experiments with standard ( eager ) evaluation and other heuristics (causal graphs [Helmert, 2004], landmark count [Richter et al., 2008], landmark cut [Helmert and Domshlak, 2009]) yielded similar trends. We use Fast Downward [Helmert, 2006], configured not to re-open nodes.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Eldan Cohen and J. Christopher Beck Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada {ecohen, jcb}@mie.utoronto.ca
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 presents pseudocode for a randomized restarting GBFS (RRGBFS).
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide an explicit statement or link to the open-source code for the methodology described in this paper.
Open Datasets Yes We use the six benchmark domains in Cohen and Beck [2018], for which the constrainedness of problems can be controlled either by resource-constrainedness parameter (denoted C) or by goal-constrainedness parameter (denoted λ): No Mystery, Rovers, TPP, Maintenance, Parking, and Freecell.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not explicitly provide training/validation/test dataset splits. It mentions using ensembles of random problems and multiple runs on single instances, but not specific partitioning for training, validation, or testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not explicitly describe the hardware used to run its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using "Fast Downward [Helmert, 2006]" and "FF heuristic [Hoffmann and Nebel, 2001]" but does not specify exact version numbers for these or any other software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes We use randomized heuristic search with a geometric restart policy [Walsh, 1999] with an initial value of 16, increasing with a factor of 1.5: (16, 24, 36, ...).