Multi-View Stochastic Block Models

Authors: Vincent Cohen-Addad, Tommaso D’Orsi, Silvio Lattanzi, Rajai Nasser

ICML 2024 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Finally, we corroborate our results with experimental evaluations.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration 1Google Research 2BIDSA, Bocconi.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Community detection for multi-view stochastic block models; Algorithm 2 Second moment rounding
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any link or explicit statement about the availability of its source code.
Open Datasets No Experiments are presented in Section 5. The next figures compares the results on (z, (f1, G1), . . . , (ft, Gt)) (d,ε,k,t)-MV-SBMn (for a wide range of parameters) of the following algorithms: A.1 Louvain s algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008) on the union graph S A.2 Algorithm 1 with Louvain s algorithm applied in place of the estimator of Theorem 3.1 . (Note: synthetic data does not constitute a public dataset unless made available.)
Dataset Splits No The paper conducts experiments on synthetic data but does not explicitly mention train, validation, or test splits. The parameters for synthetic data generation are described, but not data partitioning.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware used for the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions 'Louvain s algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008)' but does not provide specific version numbers for any software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes The next figures compares the results on (z, (f1, G1), . . . , (ft, Gt)) (d,ε,k,t)-MV-SBMn (for a wide range of parameters) of the following algorithms: A.1 Louvain s algorithm (Blondel et al., 2008) on the union graph S A.2 Algorithm 1 with Louvain s algorithm applied in place of the estimator of Theorem 3.1. The y-axis measures agreement as defined in Equation (2). Results are averaged over 20 simulations. Figure 1. Fixing t = 10, n = 1000, k = 10, d = 50 and varying ε in [0.5, 1.5]. Figure 2. Fixing t = 10, n = 1000, k = 10, ε = 0.5 and varying d in [50, 150].