On Exploiting Hitting Sets for Model Reconciliation

Authors: Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Alessandro Previti, William Yeoh6514-6521

AAAI 2021 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We conclude our paper with an empirical evaluation of the newly introduced approach on planning instances, where we show how it outperforms an existing stateof-the-art solver, and generic non-planning instances from recent SAT competitions, for which no other solver exists.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou,1 Alessandro Previti, 2 William Yeoh 1 1 Washington University in St. Louis 2 Ericsson Research {v.stylianos, wyeoh}@wustl.edu, alessandro.previti@ericsson.com
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Basic algorithm for computing the smallest support (one KB)
Open Source Code Yes The code repository is: https://github.com/vstylianos/aaai21.
Open Datasets Yes We used the actual IPC instances as the model of the agent (i.e., KBa)...
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions using 'IPC instances' and 'SAT competition instances' but does not specify any training, validation, or test dataset splits, percentages, or methodology for data partitioning.
Hardware Specification Yes We ran our experiments on a Mac Book Pro machine comprising of an Intel Core i7 2.6GHz processor with 16GB of memory.
Software Dependencies No Our implementation of Algorithm 2 is written in Python and integrates calls to SAT, MCS/MUS, and minimal hitting set oracles through the Py SAT toolkit (Ignatiev, Morgado, and Marques-Silva 2018).
Experiment Setup Yes The time limit was set to 1500s.