On the relations of LFPs & Neural Spike Trains

Authors: David E Carlson, Jana Schaich Borg, Kafui Dzirasa, Lawrence Carin

NeurIPS 2014 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Results are based on data sets in which spike and LFP data are recorded simultaneously from up to 16 brain regions in a mouse.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Duke University Duham, NC 27701
Pseudocode No The paper describes the model and inference steps mathematically and textually but does not include any pseudocode or clearly labeled algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any link to source code or explicitly state that the code for the methodology is open-source or publicly available.
Open Datasets No The paper describes using two datasets from mouse brains, referencing a previous publication ([7]) for the first dataset's description. However, it does not provide any direct link, DOI, repository, or explicit statement of public availability for either dataset.
Dataset Splits Yes Cross-validation was performed using leave-one-out analysis over time bins, using the error metric of reduction in fractional error (RFE), 1 ||xb ˆxb||2 2/||xb||2 2.
Hardware Specification No The paper mentions that "Neuronal activity was recorded using a Multi-Neuron Acquisition Processor (Plexon)" but does not specify the computing hardware (e.g., GPU, CPU models, memory) used for running the computational experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions that "Spike sorting is performed on the spiking data by a VB implementation of [6]", which refers to a method, but does not list any specific software libraries or tools with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes For all experiments we choose L such that the dictionary element covered 0.5 seconds before and after each spike event. In the experiments, in one example the bins are chosen to be 30 seconds wide (novel-environment data) and in the other 1 minute (sleep-cycle data), and these are principally chosen for computational convenience (the second data set is nine times longer). Similar results were found with windows as narrow as 10 second, or as wide as 2 minutes.