Optimal Tagging with Markov Chain Optimization

Authors: Nir Rosenfeld, Amir Globerson

NeurIPS 2016 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we perform experiments on three tagging datasets, and show that the greedy algorithm outperforms other baselines.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Nir Rosenfeld School of Computer Science and Engineering Hebrew University of Jerusalem nir.rosenfeld@mail.huji.ac.il Amir Globerson The Blavatnik School of Computer Science Tel Aviv University gamir@post.tau.ac.il
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 SIMPLEGREEDYTAGOPT(Q, Q+, π, k) See supp. for efficient implementation
Open Source Code No The paper mentions "See supp. for efficient implementation" for Algorithm 1 but does not explicitly state that source code is released or provide a link to a repository.
Open Datasets Yes collected from Last.fm, Delicious, and Movielens by the Het Rec 2011 workshop [3].
Dataset Splits No The paper describes generating problem instances and evaluating performance but does not specify a distinct validation set or its split.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware (CPU, GPU models, etc.) used to run the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not list specific software dependencies or their version numbers (e.g., programming languages, libraries, or frameworks).
Experiment Setup Yes Transition probabilities from tags to items were set to be proportional to the item weights... The initial distribution was set to be uniform over the set of candidate tags, and the transition probability from items to was set to ϵ = 0.1.