Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression

Authors: Nan Jiang, Yexiang Xue

AAAI 2024 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We evaluate Racing CVGP on several synthetic and real-world datasets corresponding to true physics laws. We demonstrate that Racing CVGP outperforms CVGP and a series of symbolic regressors which discover equations from fixed datasets.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Nan Jiang, Yexiang Xue Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, USA {jiang631, yexiang}@purdue.edu
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Racing Control Variable Genetic Programming
Open Source Code Yes 1The code is at https://bitbucket.org/xlnxyx/racing cvgp. Please refer to https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07934 for the Appendix.
Open Datasets Yes We consider several publicly available and multivariable datasets, including 1) Trigonometric datasets (Jiang and Xue 2023), 2) Livermore2 datasets (Petersen et al. 2021), and 3) Feynamn datasets (Matsubara et al. 2022).
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions using datasets for experiments but does not provide specific details on training, validation, or test splits (e.g., percentages, sample counts, or explicit splitting methodology).
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware used for running the experiments (e.g., specific GPU/CPU models, memory, or cloud instance types).
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific version numbers for any software dependencies (e.g., programming languages, libraries, or frameworks).
Experiment Setup No The paper does not explicitly provide details about the experimental setup such as specific hyperparameter values (e.g., learning rate, batch size, epochs) or optimizer settings in the main text.