Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].
Reinforcement Learning in Configurable Continuous Environments
Authors: Alberto Maria Metelli, Emanuele Ghelfi, Marcello Restelli
ICML 2019 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | In this section, we provide the experimental evaluation of REMPS on three domains: a simple chain domain (Section 6.1, Figure 1), the classical Cartpole (Section 6.2) and a more challenging car-configuration task based on TORCS (Section 6.3). |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | 1Politecnico di Milano, 32, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, Milan, Italy. |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1 Relative Entropy Model Policy Search |
| Open Source Code | No | The paper does not provide explicit statements about the release of its own source code or links to a code repository for the described methodology. |
| Open Datasets | No | The paper mentions benchmark environments like Cartpole and TORCS, which are generally known, but does not provide specific access information (links, DOIs, repository names, or formal citations for specific dataset instances) for the training data or collected datasets used in their experiments. |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper does not provide specific details on dataset splits (e.g., percentages or counts for training, validation, and test sets) or cross-validation setup. |
| Hardware Specification | No | The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory, or cloud instances) used for running the experiments. |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper mentions software like TORCS but does not provide specific version numbers for any ancillary software, libraries, or dependencies used in the experiments. |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | Hyperparameter values and further experiments, including the effect of the different projection strategies, no-configuration cases, and the comparison with SPMI (Metelli et al., 2018), are reported in Appendix D.1. |