RepRev: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Misreported Ratings

Authors: Yuan Liu, Siyuan Liu, Jie Zhang, Hui Fang, Han Yu, Chunyan Miao

AAAI 2014 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Experiments demonstrate the necessity and effectiveness of the proposed mechanism. To evaluate the performance of Rep Rev, we construct a simulated multi-agent environment with 1,000 seller agents and 10,000 buyer agents.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Yuan Liu, Siyuan Liu, Hui Fang, Jie Zhang, Han Yu, Chunyan Miao School of Computer Engineering Nanyang Technological University, Singapore {yliu3, syliu, zhangj, hfang1, han.yu, ascymiao}@ntu.edu.sg
Pseudocode No The paper describes the mechanism in numbered steps and equations, but it is not formatted as pseudocode or an algorithm block.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any statement about releasing source code or a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets No The paper describes a simulated multi-agent environment for experiments and does not mention using or providing access to a public dataset.
Dataset Splits No The paper describes a simulated environment and experimental parameters, but does not explicitly define training, validation, or test dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes To evaluate the performance of Rep Rev, we construct a simulated multi-agent environment with 1,000 seller agents and 10,000 buyer agents. The sellers are equally divided into 5 groups. In each group, the sellers have the same probability of conducting transactions honestly (i.e., the probability values are 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, and 0.5, respectively). When a buyer requests an item, she will select a seller with probability proportional to each seller s reputation standing among all sellers. In a transaction where the seller behaves honestly, he will gain a utility of 2. Otherwise, he will gain a utility of 3. We vary the probability of a buyer providing misreports for a seller at a value from the set {0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09, 0.1}.