Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].
Scalable Infomin Learning
Authors: Yanzhi Chen, weihao sun, Yingzhen Li, Adrian Weller
NeurIPS 2022 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | Experiments on algorithmic fairness, disentangled representation learning and domain adaptation verify that our method can effectively remove unwanted information with limited time budget. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | Yanzhi Chen1, Weihao Sun2, Yingzhen Li3, Adrian Weller1,4 1University of Cambridge, 2Rutgers University, 3Imperial College London, 4Alan Turing Institute |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1 Adversarial Infomin Learning; Algorithm 2 Slice Infomin Learning |
| Open Source Code | Yes | Code is available at github.com/cyz-ai/infomin. |
| Open Datasets | Yes | US Census Demographic data.; UCI Adult data.; Dsprite. A 2D shape dataset [65]; CMU-PIE. A colored face image dataset [66]; MNIST MNIST-M.; CIFAR10 STL10. |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper does not explicitly provide details about a validation dataset split (e.g., specific percentages or counts for a validation set), only mentioning training and testing data for its experiments. |
| Hardware Specification | Yes | All experiments are done with a single NVIDIA Ge Force Tesla T4 GPU. |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper mentions deep learning frameworks like Tensorflow [35] and PyTorch [36] but does not provide specific version numbers for these or any other software dependencies. |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | Throughout our experiments, we use 200 slices. We find that this setting is robust across different tasks. An ablation study on the number of slices is given in Appendix B. The order of the polynomial used in (6) namely K is set as K = 3 and is fixed across different tasks. |