Sorting Sequential Portfolios in Automated Planning

Authors: Sergio Núñez, Daniel Borrajo, Carlos Linares López

IJCAI 2015 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We empirically show that our greedy approach produces near-optimal solutions very quickly and that it generalizes much better than an optimal solution wrt to a specific training set which has been observed to suffer from overfitting. 3. An extensive evaluation is performed with the algorithms introduced here, a random ordering algorithm and others from the literature with data from the last three IPCs.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Sergio N u nez and Daniel Borrajo and Carlos Linares L opez Computer Science Department Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (Spain) {sergio.nunez,daniel.borrajo,carlos.linares}@uc3m.es
Pseudocode No The paper describes the algorithms (DFBn B and SLOPE) in prose, detailing their steps, but does not present them as structured pseudocode or in a clearly labeled algorithm block.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any links to its own source code for the described methodologies, nor does it explicitly state that the code is publicly available.
Open Datasets Yes An extensive evaluation is performed with the algorithms introduced here, a random ordering algorithm and others from the literature with data from the last three IPCs. ... http://ipc.icaps-conference.org
Dataset Splits No The paper describes training and test sets (e.g., 'training set' from IPC 2008, 'test set' from IPC 2011) but does not mention a separate validation set.
Hardware Specification Yes We have used an Intel Xeon 2.93 GHZ quad core processor with 8 GB of RAM.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions 'CPLEX license' and refers to general techniques like 'Mixed-integer programming technique (MIP)' but does not provide specific version numbers for any software dependencies or libraries.
Experiment Setup Yes The time limit T used is 1800 seconds. ... The size of the candidate and component planners sets are defined in the ranges [8, 38] and [3, 14] respectively.