Streaming Min-max Hypergraph Partitioning

Authors: Dan Alistarh, Jennifer Iglesias, Milan Vojnovic

NeurIPS 2015 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We also report results of an extensive empirical evaluation, which demonstrate that this greedy strategy yields superior performance when compared with alternative approaches.Further, we provide experimental evidence that this greedy online algorithm exhibits good performance for several real-world input bipartite graphs, outperforming more complex assignment strategies, and even some offline approaches.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Dan Alistarh Microsoft Research Cambridge, United Kingdom dan.alistarh@microsoft.com Jennifer Iglesias Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA jiglesia@andrew.cmu.edu Milan Vojnovic Microsoft Research Cambridge, United Kingdom milanv@microsoft.com
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: The greedy algorithm.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide an explicit statement about releasing the source code or a link to a repository.
Open Datasets Yes We first consider a set of real-world bipartite graph instances with a summary provided in Table 3. All these datasets are available online, except for Zune podcast subscriptions.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not provide specific dataset split information (exact percentages, sample counts, citations to predefined splits, or detailed splitting methodology) needed to reproduce the data partitioning. It operates in a streaming model.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific hardware details (exact GPU/CPU models, processor types with speeds, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) used for running its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific ancillary software details (e.g., library or solver names with version numbers) needed to replicate the experiment.
Experiment Setup Yes We allow a slack (parameter c) of up to 100 topics.