Teaching with Limited Information on the Learner’s Behaviour

Authors: Ferdinando Cicalese, Sergio Filho, Eduardo Laber, Marco Molinaro

ICML 2020 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Finally, to complement our theoretical results, we present in Section 5 experiments with 12 real datasets that show that our basic Teacher (the Aagno from Section 2) sends significantly fewer examples, to reach a given level of accuracy, than a Teacher that does not interact with the Learner.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Italy 2Department of Computer Science, PUC-Rio, Brazil.
Pseudocode Yes Figure 1. Teacher s algorithm for teaching a realizable hypothesis
Open Source Code No No statement explicitly releasing source code for the described methodology or a link to a code repository was found.
Open Datasets Yes For our evaluation we used Random Forest and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) as learners, and conducted experiments on 12 datasets: mnist and 11 others from the UCI repository (mushroom, avila, bank marketing, car, Credit Card, Firm Teacher, crowdsourced, Electrical grid, HTRU, nursery and Sensorless drive).
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions 'trained and tested in the full dataset' but does not specify explicit training/validation/test splits, percentages, or methodology for partitioning the data.
Hardware Specification No No specific hardware details (such as GPU/CPU models, memory, or processor types) used for running the experiments were provided in the paper.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions 'Random Forest and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM)' but does not provide specific version numbers for these or any other software dependencies.
Experiment Setup No The paper does not provide specific experimental setup details such as hyperparameter values, training configurations, or system-level settings for the algorithms used.