The Impact of Treewidth on ASP Grounding and Solving

Authors: Bernhard Bliem, Marius Moldovan, Michael Morak, Stefan Woltran

IJCAI 2017 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We first perform an experimental evaluation that shows that the solving performance is heavily influenced by the treewidth, given ground input programs that are otherwise uniform, both in size and construction.
Researcher Affiliation Academia TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
Pseudocode No The paper includes code listings (Listing 1 and 2) but no explicitly labeled
Open Source Code No The paper provides a link to benchmarks, but not to the source code for the methodology itself (e.g., the implementation of connection-guarded programs or the experimental setup scripts).
Open Datasets Yes Full archive: http://dbai.tuwien.ac.at/proj/decodyn/ijcai17-benchmarks.zip
Dataset Splits No The paper describes the construction of input instances and their properties but does not specify any training, validation, or test dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not mention any specific hardware used for running the experiments (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory, or cloud instances).
Software Dependencies Yes Grounding was done using the grounder gringo 4.5.4 [Gebser et al., 2011]. We then measured the running time of the ASP solvers clasp 3.1.4 [Gebser et al., 2011] and WASP 2.0 [Alviano et al., 2015].
Experiment Setup No The paper describes how the input instances were generated and the software used, but it does not specify any hyperparameters or system-level training settings for the ASP solvers.