The Implicit Fairness Criterion of Unconstrained Learning

Authors: Lydia T. Liu, Max Simchowitz, Moritz Hardt

ICML 2019 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Finally, we verify our theoretical findings with experiments on two well-known datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of unconstrained learning in achieving approximate calibration with respect to multiple group attributes simultaneously. (Section 1)
Researcher Affiliation Academia Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not include any explicit statement about releasing source code or a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets Yes These are the Adult dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository (Dua and Karra Taniskidou, 2017) and a dataset of pretrial defendants from Broward County, Florida (Angwin et al., 2016; Dressel and Farid, 2018) (Section 3).
Dataset Splits Yes Score functions are obtained by logistic regression on a training set that is 80% of the original dataset, using all available features, unless otherwise stated. (Section 3)
Hardware Specification No The paper does not specify any hardware details (e.g., GPU models, CPU types, memory) used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions that score functions are obtained by 'logistic regression' but does not specify any software names with version numbers (e.g., Python, PyTorch, scikit-learn, etc.).
Experiment Setup Yes Score functions are obtained by logistic regression on a training set that is 80% of the original dataset, using all available features, unless otherwise stated. (Section 3). In Figure 6 (top), we implicitly restrict the model class by varying the regularization parameter: with a smaller parameters corresponding to more severe regularization, constraining the learned weights to be inside a smaller L1 ball. (Section 3.3)