The Relative Expressiveness of Abstract Argumentation and Logic Programming

Authors: Hannes Strass

AAAI 2015 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We analyze the relative expressiveness of the two-valued semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks, normal logic programs and abstract dialectical frameworks. By expressiveness we mean the ability to encode a desired set of two-valued interpretations over a given propositional vocabulary A using only atoms from A.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Hannes Strass Computer Science Institute Leipzig University, Germany strass@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide an explicit statement or link to open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical studies with datasets.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical studies with datasets, therefore no training/validation/test splits are mentioned.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not provide specific hardware details for any computations performed.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using the solver clasp (Gebser et al. 2011), but does not provide a specific version number for it or any other software dependencies.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and focuses on formal analysis rather than experimental setup details.