Trajectory Inference via Mean-field Langevin in Path Space

Authors: Lénaïc Chizat, Stephen Zhang, Matthieu Heitz, Geoffrey Schiebinger

NeurIPS 2022 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental In Figure 1(left) we illustrate two extreme cases: N = 1 (very few samples at intermediate timepoints) and N = 64 (uniform sampling over time) respectively, with λ = 0.05, λg WOT = 0.0025. Visually, it seems that the output of MFL is robust to the few-sample regime, with relatively little qualitative difference between the reconstructed trajectories for N = 1, 64. On the other hand, the performance of g WOT degrades visibly once the set of observed points is a poor reflection of the support of the underlying process. To examine this quantitatively, we applied both MFL dynamics and g WOT for various values of N and computed the root-mean-square (RMS) Energy Distance [29] over time to an approximate ground truth (see Appendix G).
Researcher Affiliation Academia Joint first authors. Institute of mathematics, EPFL, Switzerland University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia University of British Columbia, Canada
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain a formally labeled pseudocode or algorithm block.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide an explicit statement or link to open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets Yes We now consider the stem cell reprogramming dataset of [2], in which a population of differentiating cells were profiled over a time course using single-cell RNA sequencing. For the purpose of this example, we restrict our attention to days 2.5-6 inclusive making a total of 8 timepoints.
Dataset Splits No The paper describes how data was subsampled for evaluation, but it does not specify explicit training or validation splits in the context of model parameter tuning or typical machine learning training processes.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific hardware details (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory) used for running the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific software names with version numbers for dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes In Figure 1(left) we illustrate two extreme cases: N = 1 (very few samples at intermediate timepoints) and N = 64 (uniform sampling over time) respectively, with λ = 0.05, λg WOT = 0.0025. ... where ρ > 0 is a parameter... From this, we subsampled timepoints consisting of 100 cells at days 2.5 and 6, and 10 cells at the remaining intermediate timepoints.