Understanding Information Diffusion under Interactions

Authors: Yuan Su, Xi Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Wen Hua, Xiaofang Zhou, Binxing Fang

IJCAI 2016 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Experiments with large-scale Weibo dataset demonstrate that IAD outperforms the state-of-art baselines in terms of F1-score and accuracy, as well as the runtime for learning.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China University of Illinois at Chicago, USA Institute for Data Science, Tsinghua University, China The University of Queensland, Australia Soochow University, China
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or clearly labeled algorithm block was found in the paper.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any statement or link indicating that the source code for their methodology is openly available.
Open Datasets Yes The Weibo dataset [Zhang et al., 2013] provides a list of Weibo users who have forwarded contagions, as well as the forwarding timestamp.
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions '90% of the instances as the training set, and the remaining 10% as the testing set' but does not explicitly mention a separate validation split.
Hardware Specification Yes All experiments are performed on a dual-core Xeon E5-2690 v2 processor.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using 'LIBSVM [Chang and Lin, 2011]' and 'LDA [Blei et al., 2003]' but does not provide specific version numbers for these software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes We set the number of latent topics set |t| = 20, 30 and 50 respectively. ... we set K = 1 and 2. ... we set a predicting result to 0 if the predicting infection probability is less than 0.5, otherwise we set the predicting result to 1. ... Stochastic gradient ascent is adopted to fit the model.