Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

A Survey of Opponent Modeling in Adversarial Domains

Authors: Samer Nashed, Shlomo Zilberstein

JAIR 2022 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical This survey presents a comprehensive overview of existing opponent modeling techniques for adversarial domains... We discuss all the components of opponent modeling systems... These discussions lead us to propose a new form of analysis... We then introduce a new framework that facilitates method comparison, analyze a representative selection of techniques using the proposed framework, and highlight common trends among recently proposed methods. Finally, we list several open problems and discuss future research directions...
Researcher Affiliation Academia Samer B. Nashed EMAIL Shlomo Zilberstein EMAIL University of Massachusetts Amherst Manning College of Information and Computer Sciences Amherst, MA 01002 USA
Pseudocode No The paper discusses various algorithms and methods developed by other researchers, but it does not present any structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks for its own proposed framework or analysis.
Open Source Code No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework. It does not describe a specific methodology requiring source code to be released. Therefore, there is no statement about open-sourcing code for the work presented in this paper.
Open Datasets No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework, which analyzes existing research. It does not conduct its own experiments or use a specific dataset that it would then make publicly available. It mentions datasets in the context of other research, but not for its own work.
Dataset Splits No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework. It does not conduct its own experiments or use a specific dataset that would require train/test/validation splits to reproduce. Therefore, no dataset split information is provided.
Hardware Specification No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework. It does not describe new experimental work that would require specific hardware for execution or training. Therefore, no hardware specifications are provided.
Software Dependencies No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework. It does not implement a new methodology or run experiments that would require specific software dependencies with version numbers. Therefore, no software dependency details are provided.
Experiment Setup No The paper is a survey and theoretical framework. It does not describe new experiments or propose a specific model that would require details on hyperparameters or training configurations. Therefore, no experimental setup details are provided.