Actionable Combined High Utility Itemset Mining

Authors: Jingyu Shao, Junfu Yin, Wei Liu, Longbing Cao

AAAI 2015 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental The experimental results are promising, compared to those from traditional HUIM algorithm (UP-Growth).
Researcher Affiliation Academia Jingyu Shao, Junfu Yin, Wei Liu and Longbing Cao Advanced Analytics Institute, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology, Sydney, 100 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, AU, 2007 http://www-staff.it.uts.edu.au/ lbcao/publication/publications.htm {Jingyu.Shao,Junfu.Yin}@student.uts.edu.au; {Wei.Liu,Longbing.Cao}@uts.edu.au
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain a pseudocode block or clearly labeled algorithm.
Open Source Code No No statement or link indicating the release of open-source code for the methodology described in this paper was found.
Open Datasets Yes We conduct experiments on the real datasets downloaded from (Brijs et al. 1999).
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions splitting the database into 10 parts for evaluation but does not specify a distinct validation set. The database is split into 10 parts randomly. The first part contains 10% transactions in the database and each later part contains 10% more than the former part.
Hardware Specification No No specific hardware details (like GPU/CPU models, memory, or specific computing environments) used for running experiments were provided.
Software Dependencies No No specific software dependencies with version numbers were listed.
Experiment Setup Yes The utilities of the items are randomly generated as (Tseng et al. 2010). The database is split into 10 parts randomly. The first part contains 10% transactions in the database and each later part contains 10% more than the former part. The top 100 experimental results are selected and shown in figure 2.