An Ambiguity Aversion Model for Decision Making under Ambiguity

Authors: Wenjun Ma, Xudong Luo, Yuncheng Jiang

AAAI 2017 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Some insightful properties of our model and the validating on two famous paradoxes show that our model indeed is a better alternative for decision making under ambiguity. and Finally, we will valid our model by solving two famous paradoxes.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1 School of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China. 2 Institute of Logic and Cognition, Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Pseudocode No The paper defines concepts and provides mathematical formulas but does not include any pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any statement about making its source code available or providing a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets No The paper validates its model using well-known conceptual paradoxes (Ellsberg and Machina) which are scenarios rather than traditional datasets with explicit access information.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not describe dataset splits (e.g., training, validation, test) as it focuses on theoretical model validation against conceptual paradoxes rather than empirical data evaluation.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not mention any specific hardware specifications used for experiments or computations.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not specify any software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper focuses on theoretical model development and mathematical analysis of paradoxes, and therefore does not include details on experimental setup, hyperparameters, or training configurations.