Approval-Based Apportionment

Authors: Markus Brill, Paul Gölz, Dominik Peters, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Kai Wilker1854-1861

AAAI 2020 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical First, we prove that committee monotonicity is compatible with extended justified representation (a representation axiom proposed by Aziz et al. 2017) by providing a rule that satisfies both properties. Second, we show that the core of an approval-based apportionment problem is always nonempty and that core-stable committees can be found in polynomial time.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Technische Universit at Berlin, Chair of Efficient Algorithms 2Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide concrete access to source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical studies or dataset usage for training.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical studies or dataset usage for validation.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not describe running experiments, therefore no hardware specifications are provided.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not describe running experiments, therefore no software dependencies with version numbers are provided.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe running experiments, therefore no experimental setup details are provided.