Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Automated Mechanism Design without Money via Machine Learning

Authors: Harikrishna Narasimhan, Shivani Agarwal, David C. Parkes

IJCAI 2016 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Experiments on synthetic and real-world data confirm the usefulness of our methods.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Harikrishna Narasimhan Harvard University EMAIL Shivani Agarwal Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University Indian Institute of Science EMAIL David C. Parkes Harvard University EMAIL
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or algorithm blocks are provided in the paper.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide concrete access to source code for the described methodology.
Open Datasets No The paper mentions generating synthetic data and using data 'obtained from the Wake County, NC Public School System' but does not provide concrete access information (link, DOI, formal citation with author/year) for any dataset used.
Dataset Splits Yes We generate 1000 examples, divided into equal train-validation-test sets, with the validation set used for parameter tuning in structural SVM.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific hardware details used for running its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific ancillary software details with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper mentions general optimization methods like 'standard gradient-based method (with multiple random restarts)' and 'parameter tuning in structural SVM' but does not provide specific hyperparameter values or detailed training configurations.