Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Bayesian Strategic Classification

Authors: Lee Cohen, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Kevin Stangl, Ali Vakilian, Juba Ziani

NeurIPS 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical The paper does not include experiments. All results are carefully proven, and do not require experiments to establish correctness.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1Stanford University. Email: EMAIL 2Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (TTIC). Email: EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL 3Georgia Institute of Technology. Email: EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Oracle(c, H) Algorithm 2: Best Response of Agents in the Linear Case Algorithm 3: The Learner s Optimization Problem: Discrete Uniform Prior
Open Source Code No The paper is theoretical and does not mention any open-source code release for the described methodology.
Open Datasets No The paper uses conceptual 'data distributions' (e.g., uniform distribution) for theoretical analysis, but does not refer to or provide access information for any publicly available or open dataset.
Dataset Splits No As a theoretical paper, it does not conduct experiments involving empirical data splits for training, validation, or testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not describe experiments run on specific hardware.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not mention specific software dependencies with version numbers for experimental reproducibility.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe an experimental setup with specific hyperparameters or system-level training settings.