Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Cake Cutting: Envy and Truth

Authors: Xiaohui Bei, Ning Chen, Guangda Huzhang, Biaoshuai Tao, Jiajun Wu

IJCAI 2017 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We show that no deterministic truthful envy-free mechanism exists in the connected piece scenario, and the same impossibility result for the general setting with some additional mild assumptions on the allocations. Finally, we study a large market model where the economy is replicated and demonstrate that truth-telling converges to a Nash equilibrium.
Researcher Affiliation Academia School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan EMAIL
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or algorithm block found.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any statement or link for open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not involve the use of datasets for training or evaluation.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve data splits for training, validation, or testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not describe experimental hardware specifications.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not list software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe experimental setup details or hyperparameters.