Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Deep Graph Matching for Partial Label Learning

Authors: Gengyu Lyu, Yanan Wu, Songhe Feng

IJCAI 2022 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Extensive experiments on various data sets have demonstrated the superiority of our proposed method.
Researcher Affiliation Academia School of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University EMAIL
Pseudocode No The paper includes diagrams (e.g., Figure 1) to illustrate the architecture but does not contain any structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not include a statement about releasing source code for the methodology or a link to a code repository.
Open Datasets Yes We implement experiments on four UCI data sets and six realworld data sets: (1) Synthetic data sets. Under different configurations of two controlling parameters (i.e. p and r), four UCI data sets generate 84 (7 3 4) synthetic data sets [Cour et al., 2011]
Dataset Splits Yes We adopt tenfold cross-validation to train the model and record the experimental results in Figure 2, Table 2 and 3.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware used for running the experiments (e.g., GPU models, CPU types, or memory specifications).
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific software dependencies with version numbers (e.g., programming language versions, library versions, or solver versions).
Experiment Setup Yes We study the sensitivity of D-GAP with respect to its two parameters: k and L. Figure 3(a)-(b) shows the performance of D-GAP under different parameter configurations on Lost data set. ... We set k among {3, 5, 8, 10, 15, 20} and L among {3, 5, 10, 20, 30} via cross-validation.