Envy-Free Mechanisms with Minimum Number of Cuts

Authors: Reza Alijani, Majid Farhadi, Mohammad Ghodsi, Masoud Seddighin, Ahmad Tajik

AAAI 2017 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We provide methods, namely expansion process and expansion process with unlocking, for dividing the cake under different assumptions on the valuation functions of the players.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Sharif University of Technology , Duke University , University of Michigan Ann Arbor , Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) School of Computer Science alijani@cs.duke.edu, {m farhadi, mseddighin}@ce.sharif.edu, ghodsi@sharif.edu, tajik@umich.edu
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 EFISM algorithm
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any concrete access information or links to open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No This is a theoretical paper that does not describe empirical experiments involving datasets or training. Therefore, it does not provide information about publicly available datasets used for training.
Dataset Splits No This is a theoretical paper that does not describe empirical experiments involving datasets. Therefore, it does not provide information about training/validation/test dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper describes theoretical algorithms and does not report on empirical experiments, thus no hardware specifications are mentioned.
Software Dependencies No The paper describes theoretical algorithms and does not report on empirical experiments, thus no specific software dependencies with version numbers are mentioned.
Experiment Setup No The paper describes theoretical algorithms and does not report on empirical experiments, thus no experimental setup details like hyperparameters or system-level training settings are provided.