Explaining Answer-Set Programs with Abstract Constraint Atoms

Authors: Thomas Eiter, Tobias Geibinger

IJCAI 2023 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We provide complexity results for checking and computing such justifications, and discuss how the semantic and syntactic approaches relate and can be jointly used to offer more insight. Our results contribute to a basis for explaining commonly used language features and thus increase accessibility and usability of ASP as an AI tool.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Thomas Eiter and Tobias Geibinger Knowledge-based Systems Group, Institute of Logic and Computation, TU Wien, Austria {thomas.eiter, tobias.geibinger}@tuwien.ac.at
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or algorithm blocks were found in the paper.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide concrete access to source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not involve training models on publicly available datasets.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not describe experiments with dataset splits (training, validation, test).
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not specify any hardware used for experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not provide specific software dependencies with version numbers for experimental reproduction.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe an experimental setup with hyperparameters or training configurations.