Information Sharing for Care Coordination

Authors: Ofra Amir

AAAI 2014 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Results from empirical evaluation show that it outperforms the inform algorithm proposed by Kamar et al. (2009)
Researcher Affiliation Academia Ofra Amir School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University oamir@seas.harvard.edu
Pseudocode No No pseudocode or algorithm blocks were found in the paper.
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any explicit statements or links indicating that open-source code for the described methodology is provided.
Open Datasets No The paper describes data collected through "interviews with care providers and parents of children with complex conditions and made observation studies in the complex primary care clinic at Stanford" and a "Wizard of Oz pilot study," but it does not provide concrete access information for a publicly available or open dataset.
Dataset Splits No No specific dataset split information, such as percentages, sample counts, or details on cross-validation, is provided in the paper.
Hardware Specification No No specific hardware details (like GPU/CPU models, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) used for running experiments are provided in the paper.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions theoretical approaches like BDI and MDP-PRT, but it does not provide specific software names or library version numbers needed to replicate the experiment.
Experiment Setup No The paper discusses a "Wizard of Oz pilot study" and "empirical evaluation" of MDP-PRT, but it does not provide specific experimental setup details such as hyperparameter values, training configurations, or system-level settings.