Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Latent Domains Modeling for Visual Domain Adaptation

Authors: Caiming Xiong, Scott McCloskey, Shao-Hang Hsieh, Jason Corso

AAAI 2014 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental In experiment, we test our approach on two common image datasets, the results show that our method outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods, and also show the superiority of multiple latent domain discovery.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration Caiming Xiong SUNY at Buffalo EMAIL Scott Mc Closkey Honeywell ACS Scott.Mc EMAIL Shao-Hang Hsieh SUNY at Buffalo EMAIL Jason J. Corso SUNY at Buffalo EMAIL
Pseudocode No The paper presents mathematical formulations and derivations, but no pseudocode blocks or algorithms are visually presented.
Open Source Code No The paper does not explicitly state that its own source code is released or provide a link to it.
Open Datasets Yes Our experiments use two different datasets: of๏ฌce dataset (Saenko et al. 2010) and bing-caltech dataset (Alessandro Bergamo 2010).
Dataset Splits No The paper does not provide specific percentages, sample counts, or explicit citations to predefined splits for training, validation, and testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware (e.g., GPU models, CPU types, memory) used to run the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions software components like SURF, Random Forest, and SVM, but does not provide specific version numbers for any of these or other relevant software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes In the experiment, we set ฮป = 5 and ฮฒ = 10.