Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Moral Responsibility for AI Systems

Authors: Sander Beckers

NeurIPS 2023 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical This paper presents a formal definition of both conditions within the framework of causal models. I compare my approach to the existing approaches of Braham and van Hees (Bv H) and of Halpern and Kleiman Weiner (HK). I then generalize my definition into a degree of responsibility.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Sander Beckers University of Amsterdam
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper is theoretical and presents formal definitions and arguments; it does not describe a software implementation for which source code would be released.
Open Datasets No The paper focuses on theoretical definitions and arguments, not on empirical studies involving dataset training.
Dataset Splits No The paper focuses on theoretical definitions and arguments, not on empirical studies involving dataset validation.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not mention any specific hardware used for experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not mention any specific software dependencies or versions.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe any experimental setup or training configurations.