Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in Coakley et alK. L. Coakley, T. Snelleman, H. Hoos, and O. E. Gundersen, "The embrace of open science: An analysis of a decade of AI research and 56 800 conference papers," Under Review, 2026..
No-Regret Online Autobidding Algorithms in First-price Auctions
Authors: Yilin LI, Yuan Deng, Wei Tang, Hanrui Zhang
NeurIPS 2025 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Theoretical | Question: Does the paper fully disclose all the information needed to reproduce the main experimental results of the paper to the extent that it affects the main claims and/or conclusions of the paper (regardless of whether the code and data are provided or not)? Answer: [NA] Justification: No experimental results. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Collaboration | Yilin Li Chinese University of Hong Kong EMAIL Yuan Deng Google Research EMAIL Wei Tang Chinese University of Hong Kong EMAIL Hanrui Zhang Chinese University of Hong Kong EMAIL |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1 No-regret bidding algorithm for known F Algorithm 2 No-regret bidding algorithm with full feedback Algorithm 3 No-regret bidding algorithm with bandit feedback |
| Open Source Code | No | Question: Does the paper provide open access to the data and code, with sufficient instructions to faithfully reproduce the main experimental results, as described in supplemental material? Answer: [NA] Justification: No data or code required. |
| Open Datasets | No | Question: Does the paper provide open access to the data and code, with sufficient instructions to faithfully reproduce the main experimental results, as described in supplemental material? Answer: [NA] Justification: No data or code required. |
| Dataset Splits | No | Question: Does the paper specify all the training and test details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they were chosen, type of optimizer, etc.) necessary to understand the results? Answer: [NA] Justification: No experimental results. |
| Hardware Specification | No | Question: For each experiment, does the paper provide sufficient information on the computer resources (type of compute workers, memory, time of execution) needed to reproduce the experiments? Answer: [NA] Justification: No experimental results. |
| Software Dependencies | No | Question: Does the paper provide SPECIFIC ANCILLARY SOFTWARE DETAILS (e.g., library or solver names with version numbers like Python 3.8, CPLEX 12.4) needed to replicate the experiment? Answer: [NA] Justification: No experimental results. |
| Experiment Setup | No | Question: Does the paper specify all the training and test details (e.g., data splits, hyperparameters, how they were chosen, type of optimizer, etc.) necessary to understand the results? Answer: [NA] Justification: No experimental results. |